ADA Evaluation Report

AQA – Accessibility conformance summary – Kon Tiki Resort Conformance Summary

1. Conformance overview based on WCAG 2.1 AA standard

Overall conformance

1 user journey | 130 issues to fix

24%PassedSuccess Criteria

24% Passed

12 Success Criteria
62% Pending review

31 Success Criteria
14% Failed

7 Success Criteria

This section shows which WCAG 2.1 AA Success Criteria failed across the entire scope and communicates the broad issues that will be needed to be understood and remedied.

Principle 1: Perceivable

47 issues to fix | 235 issues to check manually

1.1.1
Level A A , failed
1.2.1
Level A A , passed
1.2.2
Level A A , passed
1.2.3
Level A A , passed
1.2.4
Level AA AA , passed
1.2.5
Level AA AA , passed
1.3.1
Level A A , failed
1.3.2
Level A A , pending
1.3.3
Level A A , pending
1.3.4
Level AA AA , pending
1.3.5
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.1
Level A A , pending
1.4.2
Level A A , passed
1.4.3
Level AA AA , failed
1.4.4
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.5
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.10
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.11
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.12
Level AA AA , pending
1.4.13
Level AA AA , pending

Principle 2: Operable

38 issues to fix | 195 issues to check manually

2.1.1
Level A A , pending
2.1.2
Level A A , pending
2.1.4
Level A A , pending
2.2.1
Level A A , passed
2.2.2
Level A A , passed
2.3.1
Level A A , pending
2.4.1
Level A A , pending
2.4.2
Level A A , pending
2.4.3
Level A A , pending
2.4.4
Level A A , failed
2.4.5
Level AA AA , pending
2.4.6
Level AA AA , failed
2.4.7
Level AA AA , pending
2.5.1
Level A A , pending
2.5.2
Level A A , pending
2.5.3
Level A A , pending
2.5.4
Level A A , pending

Principle 3: Understandable

4 issues to fix | 30 issues to check manually

3.1.1
Level A A , passed
3.1.2
Level AA AA , pending
3.2.1
Level A A , passed
3.2.2
Level A A , passed
3.2.3
Level AA AA , pending
3.2.4
Level AA AA , pending
3.3.1
Level A A , pending
3.3.2
Level A A , failed
3.3.3
Level AA AA , pending
3.3.4
Level AA AA , pending

Principle 4: Robust

41 issues to fix | 16 issues to check manually

4.1.1
Level A A , passed
4.1.2
Level A A , failed
4.1.3
Level AA AA , pending

Code quality

Average A11Y Score

63.6%

3180/5000

The average A11Y Score is the sum of all the score results and is divided by the number of the evaluated user journeys. It represents a basic indicator of the overall code quality across the scope of the test.

Remediation focus

130 total issues to fix
114 issues have a high impact on the site’s user experience
Kon Tiki Resort Website is the user journey where high severity issues are more concentrated
Kon Tiki Resort Website is the user journey with the highest number of issues

2. Failed Criteria Data Breakdown

Success criteria	A11Y score	Issues to fix	High severity issues
1.1.1: Non-text Content	37	27	27 !!
1.3.1: Info and Relationships	45	4	4 !!
1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum)	16	16
2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context)	36	37	37 !!
2.4.6: Headings and Labels	64	1	1 !!
3.3.2: Labels or Instructions	86	4	4 !!
4.1.2: Name, Role, Value	18	41	41 !!

3. In-scope user journeys

page collection

Kon Tiki Resort Website

Entry point URL:

https://www.kontiki-resort.com/

User journey ID:

T80662

Device:

Chrome 78 (Windows), medium 1600 x 900

No. of pages:

38

4. Testing results

User journey	Review status	Conformance [1]	A11y score [2]	Issues to fix
Kon Tiki Resort Website	0% reviewed	Passed: 12 Pending review: 31 Failed: 7	63.6% ± 32.1% estimated ~3180/5000	130

[1] Depending on the current review status, the Conformance column displays the temporary or final state of Success Criteria for each tested user journey.
For WCAG 2.1 AA standard (used in this test), there are 50 Success Criteria you can find listed as passed, pending review or failed. ↩

Accessibility conformance summary

Kon Tiki Resort